Neilpryde RS:Slalom MKIII or RS:Racing Evo2?


I didn't want to rush this experiment, but now with lots of Time on Water with both sails I think to have found the differences. I have only sailed the RS:Slalom MKIII with X9 masts, but have seen the X6 mast as well. The RS:Racing Evo2 was also on the same X9 masts. I chose to compare with the same mast, this makes it easier to see/feel the difference.

Rigging/Tuning
Believe it or not, the RS:Racing Evo2 is easier to pop the cambers on the X9 mast (more space). If the cams are on the mast the RS:Slalom MKIII is just easier, haven't measured it but the RS:Slalom MKIII seems to have a touch more downhaul tension compared to last years RS:Racing (EVO1). Both the RS:Slalom MKIII/RS:Racing Evo2 accelerate fastest with recommended downhaul, I do like some less downhaul too. More downhaul is giving only control, in other words its putting a part of your sail in neutral instead of drive... I use a bit less outhaul tension than recommended, however I saw Martin van Meurs using some tension and going faster than many other RS:Racings (including myself on RSR E1 6.2)


On shore performance
The RS:Slalom MKIII has so far proven to more durable, haven't experienced a broken cross-batten. For people that don't know: "fanatical speedsurfers often walk around their gear to good spots, I do walk over 5km for one good session"
You can imagen that crossbatten will hit the ground sometimes... And yes broken crossbattens are quite normal, but the RS:Slalom didn't break after now +- 15km walking. The materials used in the RS:Slalom MKIII feel a bit more durable.
When trying to rotate the sails onshore imdiately most will be suprised, the RS:Racing Evo2 does rotate better... further more about this

On the water
There are just a few things I felt from first moment. The RS:Slalom MKIII makes it easier to fly, quite a bit less mastfootpressure (especially the 5.5). THe handling is more personal, I like a sail to be stiff enough to keep the mastfootpressure constant. This is what the RS:Slalom MKIII delivers, in strong gusts the sail can be trimmed easy. The RS:Racing Evo2 has to be handled more extreme, I have to adjust my stance a bit more. The RS:Racing Evo2 is a touch stiffer, but also more mastcurve. I wouldn't be suprised if it is the same as RS:Slalom MKIII in gusts (bends towards RS:Racing E2 shape)...

"The RS:Slalom MKIII is the best value for money speedsail by Neilpryde, you will be competitive in all conditions! It does take a bit more energy upwind/deaccelerating compared to the RS:Racing Evo2, but it will pay back in easyness downwind"

Windrange
When sailing in the "sweetspot" I don't see a difference in performance between RS:Racing Evo2 & RS:Slalom MKIII. I did one underpowered session with both RS:Slalom MKIII 5.5 and RS:Racing EVO2 5.5, suprisingly the RS:Slalom MKIII was a bit faster 68kmh against 71kmh...
Overpowered there is a little problem with the Neilpryde RS:Slalom MKIII, the mastsleef/tension is somehow a lot less locked. The RS:Slalom MKIII needs a lot battentension on cam-battens, this makes the sail rotate bad. With loads of battentension I came last session from the water with my RS:Slalom MKIII 5.5 feeling a bit flighty, a kitesurfer told me he measures constantly 45-48kn gusts... And the RS:Slalom MKIII was stable (I still don't believe). I was surfing close to 40kn over 0,4m-0,5m chop, thanks to the lesser mastfootpressure I can fly over shit.

Accelerating I would prefer the RS:Slalom MKIII because it lifts the gear a good out of the water. In really strong gusts the softness of the sail keep you on the water, what can go wrong? Deacceleration (on the edge sailing/ trying to keep the sail against neutral/upwind sailing) the RS:Racing EVO2 is quite a bit better.

Hope this helps breaking personal records!

Used for this sailreview:
50 surfsessions stats from myself
My own bucks
Neilpryde RS:Racing Evo1 6.2
Neilpryde RS:Racing Evo2 5.5/6.2/7.0
Neilpryde RS:Slalom MKIII 5.5/6.2
Neilpryde X9 430 '09
Neilpryde X9 400 '08 (wave)
Neilpryde X9 430 '07
X9 160-210 boom
Carbon Art Speed 44
Fanatic Falcon Speed
Fanatic Falcon 79
Fanatic Falcon 91
Select Fins

Erik Loots

Erik is windsurfer for 10+ years. In his daily life he is professional in construction dewatering, advisor, troubleshooter. Erik likes adventures, explore and to challenge himself. During his life he is trying to get the best out of it and have respect for the earth, nature and future generations. The modern world is about sharing, in this blog Erik shares his experiences, selfreflection and lessons learned.

4 comments:

  1. Nice review of the 2 sails Eric, I am still not sure what to do. I am goint RSS in 7.8 & 9.5 but 7 down is the problem. I used my 6.7RSR the other day and 35knot gusts were not a problem. I think I need to sail the 6.2 RSS more when I am not under pressure to get results, and I can spend a little time playing around with settings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. indeed nice review. I have also already ordered a rss mk3 7.8 and 9.5. Those are the sailsizes I use the most, so should be good...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Tim/Herm,

    The Neilpryde importer told me RS:Slalom the bigger the better (compared to the RS:Racing)

    So I guess with the 7.8 & 9.5 you can't go wrong.

    Cheers,

    Erik

    ReplyDelete
  4. HyperPlanesDrifterMarch 06, 2010

    Hi,

    Has anybody (under the power of their own bucks) managed to compare the larger sizes (7.8-9.5) of RS:Slalom and RS:Racing?

    Janez.

    ReplyDelete